why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCGO4XMJ4GJTUPZTDUFSQZ4PISZRFQE3F4F6U7ATDO3Q6SQ2P5BNVYDY, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCGO4XMJ4GJTUPZTDUFSQZ4PISZRFQE3F4F6U7ATDO3Q6SQ2P5BNVYDY is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c549a9840fbfa014884f41e10045f1a8cb2f749937b5fe0bfb27635a48b7444c
- request
- a3b462206eb23d29f3b153f2a4b647a13fa5059a9646952ead7acb734553936f
- transaction
- 993a0f3b3f9eb3b3c62cf0ce12e2f5286fdb75c70aaac47565c94d6641ea445acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 70063
the chainentry 70063
- sealed to the entry before
- 2065692cb902938d887dc29340d274e174ab8955da492d6a67ec2cd4e84969f2
- this leaf
- b9b0691edcd85a714cc9a29162da458ae86b78d272e17c81359d40eee7f95980
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ikh0O/oX2tgBJm4WuwXdXmvz1DUsGfxrD+4yae4XbKJ31ebjTVe8+Zy3MGXrnaZ0GVZsHxnapdooTSQ4xdXlAQ==