why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB4WBPBMAX3FVYTFYZXPDVNHNSUZ44D35P4CLEN5SUHMJDCUM7JRJUSL, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB4WBPBMAX3FVYTFYZXPDVNHNSUZ44D35P4CLEN5SUHMJDCUM7JRJUSL is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a2b85b270f6e7b65884afb0ea3dcb6f2d1caf62243595e4f4b34af0c80652ad5
- request
- d65ea70b2ca6b629d2032c9aaf8eb9bb54dbfa70410fcf7d932201bc5b51c949
- transaction
- aa5d99df34e2edd85ba88bd7fef45e9fc9a04fd7aba954bbe1345a52c008e441computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 22294
the chainentry 22294
- sealed to the entry before
- 0cc0307533f22776c432107dcd4406dfac453e7b678b94d1a568a6cb1de850a5
- this leaf
- ba2e29f412642281163ce0f25eec4cd97392bfcb408613652d999352f059b9aa
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- DzRVR1VUZzS40pVxgckzGBNh/wLD+AoTdNum70PWX5r8CcrWUKaZxOiGd35kvxby5cXpmDlRgGt6EM1x+RzgAA==