why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCUX2PYXMAUI4U3UMZGE4Q3HGK22DS3D3HEWF6K5FFJUYJ4PMMD332UY to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 027a0d8548fdd7875f420f7fd77eafcd2515dc9ca0f15f8a80af527ee654e9f7
- request
- aae116839906ff014832cc301f76cb640c703f6bc0be6be42ef03686ba680f8b
- transaction
- dd182e7a5dbb87babc6af8b793bc4036a01c1a50185b911ec4c31b44cb0ddb93computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76562
the chainentry 76562
- sealed to the entry before
- 879e10ae0a40d7c28584a267e651158a1b1635bccef7867352bfcb3948a03994
- this leaf
- ba49ee15a334202452b8df2855b8642215901ad1676307ad80e9f317aaa14d77
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- w4+/0xmU+DcvWyxw3MXs/+D9+aAXxllIrfR46cdNS/zfHJ6n9pHwt2Ak0eo91MbvfyB+m7CuLfiitAWaOShpCw==