why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCF4DJECTKDMB7U6OS7ZM4TLVDW5L3KDQ3YXFH6FHCDM2MFV2G2AVRMH, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCF4DJECTKDMB7U6OS7ZM4TLVDW5L3KDQ3YXFH6FHCDM2MFV2G2AVRMH is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 426f95644da9c968607982df655b11dc18f9f9dd215740b1c9608b856a2031c7
- request
- c805e5692bf5379363df8f0d9e47b6b3134329287db6576c054c635a3861d065
- transaction
- a0d720adb90afbf9844d3ef8e2c3219d328cc2b6bd6a584f595d89e95e73b029computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 52716
the chainentry 52716
- sealed to the entry before
- e19cb4792dcda3f5d867cc24d432d38785319eb470d7c73008eed0515c6f3cba
- this leaf
- baabd847f3c9873ea8cfd6967385247b050c550ecec80549d64502e9484b3d90
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- I+qfuTZQOosIZfUltB55CFYThbp7pw2oZ2Xx4GPap9lG7BgPbIK4rGTkLiDljvT9ffK4YtqZ55xf5nPreieuCw==