why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDDDOLDNJ76C3GQGQVYLZZFE4PDQKROEZEXB4H7XITCMQEO2G2L6TMUA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 418f8ae944281e91c3dcce5720b55e2c053a9ee0ba32b54bc700cf77ecd16173
- request
- f009d3952d7236884f73d4dc6dcf5888d0fef0d07741d03cb632c54960cb732e
- transaction
- 74736340e09e6a8b37a02a0857e3a3469e8ea84bed319d8ce8d8c18b4a726ec8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 66659
the chainentry 66659
- sealed to the entry before
- c328831860eef89a6c564dcf13ef0c4e234d6198319a0760202986a76234bd57
- this leaf
- bae4fe180259a9b241c5996475a8100806e994e710b39a171827c6b7cb626057
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- LpazzUhXgsbjsZXp5l7u9XDo9cOrN+zC5TcAJK6G978l5aJ1WrVFnW2l2fJiZoh+7mPnrHcjN8ItdjgruUH2Bw==