why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB7TCEJ2SDHY7T4D2LEJKNIK74JCYFRBMNB6KW6AINTUPIY3U7YMH77Y, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7b028bbd9a38b5aa369a73b4dac47000dfeb0de68a059ef4612db315b157af4d
- request
- 57c027eb2aad91f113b903ad8beabf73836c7d327f876a6c2c8252e7a5634da1
- transaction
- 7b4cf1602ed78cb7f3d33d084ac89c0c6f29856b91f9629d098a82806705141fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57318
the chainentry 57318
- sealed to the entry before
- baf744dbad75e4f1c140cf3373f3450a41c03df122913211d5f77e014f74b57c
- this leaf
- bb3b5c816301ac2a5465a54cbb6863bb18e759d9fc9aaae0b0448727668b0118
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- VvWdDQzBUl9yOfs+6w2J3j+TxAKvtIXWCnlkALBK624CYKiiwKj7Si7S91I6Qp22NRO7F8RYUWTjEb4Fk+bfBw==