why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBK3FQC3MF7QULIYSUBQLAZMZP7DWQLDK7EXV4MRMX2ZP5CAOEUZMN62, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBK3FQC3MF7QULIYSUBQLAZMZP7DWQLDK7EXV4MRMX2ZP5CAOEUZMN62 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d534aad9bea8c546ca20aa44cce067033e4ed42847b99025ed7d759b9a11dbd5
- request
- 620764b88e1b2a21698b2d1b4eafb8b3963e213e739d8ad2e2a716e538cdecbf
- transaction
- 68770483353223032e1e0c2c9c312c9180a1f9c6b3339f67fa5a02c37c8bad56computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57407
the chainentry 57407
- sealed to the entry before
- f99bacfaba59c2316d06a917fd9c5d1a53818d87421e6f5def0597971fe7881b
- this leaf
- bda97ecf9b7dad0539bee743957cb92dba17028333fc9af9c7709b8a06bf0c87
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- lDbob7aDl5qCu8VuIscOJm73/+PfLVrk7ZIbHFs+TltHTe3gepMcp7uWP4b77kax8ADB1vn0nQ2w7PMXBelyCw==