why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCXTUSC5UHUSHNZQJYFXAV35JUA5KX6QBSKSUPVXVD2ADG2RRDJ4KC4K, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCXTUSC5UHUSHNZQJYFXAV35JUA5KX6QBSKSUPVXVD2ADG2RRDJ4KC4K is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d8e4c7a21560cd93163ae8dc4632c67962ad3a3bcc019319fc81f581e2b924f0
- request
- 9bdade3a4e0e56864eed0298a05a12b1035a2c415134606a2fce4ccefba87df8
- transaction
- 2a038c340f8e1f2e9acafb2edb6c367d70104be23d7e0b3846eb67dca52e6475computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 292
the chainentry 292
- sealed to the entry before
- d31e78a35902069b8438e83cb703eff9491eab6a67aec9b259fea4e4dae09e3d
- this leaf
- bdf77b533b27f3b1952fcaa055df60c42cdfb197046175dfcedc4589704e1f9e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- WhheMD8s/LgS+TxLvix8aRCcOOuyZYOC99zIxA3FJTOvj3Kj/uVN3YPXQ306T35WFzHz0fQJxiqTTBf5zw34DQ==