livelog 15,115 entries · root 0220d3212b6e · read 06:22:45
the record/entry 13930
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GADWNSAOPBPB3HOITGAVWZHGC7AXTT7S5QECLTN7PCYPZZGEJZCJSWTW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.945ms2026-08-19 07:57:27
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GADWNSAOPBPB3HOITGAVWZHGC7AXTT7S5QECLTN7PCYPZZGEJZCJSWTW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
5c9e133525ca851954bdc41bdc1e21ef08a63e16a73a5193450bd39d1955be99
request
361f1b34e6c3a27cac08c19cb7e9aa8534ebc5ecfb14269e3fa5f4692213052a
transaction
f5758a40eee169f3a4f2ef41d9ab605a7d9bfb8251ee33a59401d1b2d09495b8
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 13930
recomputing…
the chainentry 13930
sealed to the entry before
a94a272ff4793de882a92834e44bac1a58560ad3995ac02ceabb30b35861be46
this leaf
be016384330c32fab0d9703cd1455ca47f68c398f3600d101a93c35ca95cd279
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
znUkV1fieDpDKAxO+IsuDDKLSaAkPC5H0NVfV2dt4VTwjGPY4u0XTsxbQjhWK4bdq0+CIHIqh65H/JlItDDdDA==