livelog 22,686 entries · root 3483ca13bba8 · read 03:27:36
the record/entry 21449
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GC6FR7ZUYXNXQAJIC47WEYVF3YQ63QO6DGWBCZMS4QL3FGJF2FNP4SOP to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.479ms2026-08-25 04:22:28
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GC6FR7ZUYXNXQAJIC47WEYVF3YQ63QO6DGWBCZMS4QL3FGJF2FNP4SOP to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
d941aae6fe5bd54a39a6dc83a3f8f93afffb834d0f473c342e1530099d416413
request
5be55501aa307ff1748880df646bd6bfbd9891fcbb1004594ba7698ff6f38a58
transaction
f908066ab3b64fe6b6ffd2a070ab7d798888fc02334ccecc84709d5db59b6ec1
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 21449
recomputing…
the chainentry 21449
sealed to the entry before
04b358e4f132ca83cb6e48e169d26432ee9ef09ab62d737ac41376481e324ea1
this leaf
be08d6488539dd9207ba76b64af6afce784a5906e33e1c051814aa7a14a311a7
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
qAN72LdSlbzWcV6+3GmPQZ5sQCZdmDCR6tRctSKpt6Q02VOssxoBKn3aQtDPvws+Z+B1hudA/tcF3U6BvOEyAA==