livelog 59,138 entries · root 34cb005be5c0 · read 22:10:09
the record/entry 59025
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GD6HXT6ORIVDOY2LMV2JCBVSGLBJ57JOIG4HXQX4D6U3NFMTGOPLNFAH to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.089ms2026-09-22 20:10:08
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GD6HXT6ORIVDOY2LMV2JCBVSGLBJ57JOIG4HXQX4D6U3NFMTGOPLNFAH to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
40c20e26d2b6cae006adfc6d9de42b3e9a0cd7f92e2de8218fa0cb5e22c7a5e8
request
1a195b792ea2bdcdd0e1ec7f75e85ec3bbdc312490c24c4971a8990d40c3d8ba
transaction
69008516b9bab00eded585018fbc199d655fd54c58b474be34cb073ee9436a0b
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 59025
recomputing…
the chainentry 59025
sealed to the entry before
94928a113a71e378aaaadf1fc7e76d3498106a005ae98a4b7e62cba44b0c2825
this leaf
be20581281c63c09707cee341dc79eb3dfe5b17e2b55ef05585cb1575140b498
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
S9vjBeENugSV0OeZPNqiEXuSpTufNJlzNj426wVn4A3RWYbiZE43CGGiWdBPAscEhQ7MXuVmv3pzGB7i0bPbCA==