why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAYUP4OCMNYQ7XNJLLQUC2FS2UDN5NUFXTKQ5VFXZ5FTRPRMVF2L6LOW, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAYUP4OCMNYQ7XNJLLQUC2FS2UDN5NUFXTKQ5VFXZ5FTRPRMVF2L6LOW is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 38943f9d9efdb3cf4f3a67d349c0313439c5324ce9370f1ad3f5510ff1710033
- request
- 3c246b14fdea4aafe62beeaffc4c82541605b008c7e8d62b65621c5e20b09983
- transaction
- bcfa579d4416356c0649cb3195642048dd6a75a62bfc57160f9b8370ffea282acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 52172
the chainentry 52172
- sealed to the entry before
- 796b9bfe065ff23304b03bee6f26698312350f33b41a7c359c9c31ffe0c96252
- this leaf
- be5b0bb3e2a487ba3c4e5c2c95ac2020559cfaace0a1d7f3a04284f7db0facfa
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 9Ph1sR5PMp1gqZgSJQ1L0dKluzfMz9ki4Gh6rz4j4nqsyrXmhDyziGn37DtiaUvcamT8O0GhE7kNUR5HBJotCA==