why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GASH3QRBN545VVEMW55EH7O55RUYLG2DZKTJTIAHBDLTXCHGT5DSJTSO, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b712f73fa4eda07025ed7cf9de06f288d64d6d335fdb9b3ffd6743a5727df082
- request
- 31aa49f8802e17580cc20e6bc87d4d00bb71753181c6cef7fa59e5a7e8fd5ba6
- transaction
- d86281d913485d2e52c2791902c1a5b2efd953b00db8d48dc7277b7d6c4ae4e4computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 8966
the chainentry 8966
- sealed to the entry before
- c7819b8ffb4f1d557dc188592313d469714c251f75ff344bb69b0f0ef66c399f
- this leaf
- bec695f296b8932c690af4c05441f82ec50deef25666970e12d1aa47c8e51ab9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- TYEHDQkxtKIr1W4T3NUEfa3Xx/eIm6UW14ylyEEtA08Feq2JEZEAySOiv6AwfToDx81QHQydZFBncxHnARRiCg==