why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBGDUAZN5KWGCRR44WZ5MQTQ2JFZ525TQ5WGZQSVGKS5VWRMLHAG6IZH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ca8b3c97d0c9376ff1ffc9f9d0628178bd7c3f35b2675edc1d78e3fa2c2ad58d
- request
- 11310e6d273d2977a730ad9e14486bde6dea57b8ec14afac84fecdb8c7341017
- transaction
- ec9f629be7ebaa03674f7d3048c3edd57ab5c14e182bbe560b3dee5532668d97computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6100
the chainentry 6100
- sealed to the entry before
- cb175796244a7f8a3a919cc0a5bbd5bc370e7f3662c3a30bdb1bc6b903f3e9f6
- this leaf
- bed6f5033208e9b7f96deb89770d7e885a45e4ea28ae7d65288869c5c3affcc3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Ijrkb0gRadHnssgJytIL+LYvMeFwEI9iJnwPzPKAEEiBDum+FQ8i7q1iU7YWl+5rDUflGDtIsLdj11E5qsPtAg==