why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GCDI4QL3JKKDYDO66ZR3SQOB6R54WREDX7I5UA7GIX6HQST7RKJD5FIU, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC72B4TVSEUUTTEXGWCV2FCMQRQMU7PVGLREAROIRQ7FFHJ7G5IDIAMF, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC72B4TVSEUUTTEXGWCV2FCMQRQMU7PVGLREAROIRQ7FFHJ7G5IDIAMF is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 606503d7fd2805eb2d9e202fb0eecfb5ee0ee14da04e674e3124c43060c1de6c
- request
- 17601ab7ec9fe5088489738952723a528a641b87b73731b991d098f84ca275bf
- transaction
- da4d2e8dff17953d46bee6c62dc081d6c70e304e66148bfa00551d18c3054f01computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35613
the chainentry 35613
- sealed to the entry before
- 0e48e4d5c064b713324733ea643454bde2a4642a1273dd3b2f6f9de9ba8aa375
- this leaf
- bee95a7d73dd739ed91b2b390307c2572f2d923fc0545487731bd98e23f8fec9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- y5GZP4XWzI/7T7bLXQXL5lrqN+CTcCUJOFUCAcYR4BZeDiyLpPpz8AY8TbkMkOrRzuC+mDaK3G3ybEQr95xcAQ==