livelog 61,055 entries · root b8e26bf068f3 · read 09:35:32
the record/entry 60893
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBZYTQZUDHTUIFCVPAR4RAVANWGXYT6PONLYGNSXWSRPAMOJU3UF6OT4 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.830ms2026-09-24 06:45:16
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBZYTQZUDHTUIFCVPAR4RAVANWGXYT6PONLYGNSXWSRPAMOJU3UF6OT4 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
e2247ae1a59ea42f6e745f5a5341538179b2134ba6abd0e0081f1a175b0e8b0a
request
6a747e66391da0c7687a70b4fc4b8daa4345f94740e563eba5ff38322672f8a6
transaction
b5d25966644e50b33245411995cfa9b97d79c9775ce23b6b9a662e52bff6579c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 60893
recomputing…
the chainentry 60893
sealed to the entry before
c9c4f02c144553b66a4e0d57eaf7ef17e4ba8d133b33d082b0a41338085533c2
this leaf
bf14448dbf4e848219b43361535bd7eb10531e9ee608b258ef22b6fd45049145
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
59NFxpymAGH7onQ9aIXoFFmG9ICZRtQIiFCsMj2JoDGebe5aCuwBvesSUDqB1jKUscjdZnaGKwqioQIrnGrvBA==