livelog 35,848 entries · root 33aa059a2174 · read 07:19:23
the record/entry 35728
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDEFKM3Z6XMX4SS7IAQIMMLIPCPPBMMZ2TH4UELXIWQQAFMYQISY53HC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.449ms2026-09-05 04:47:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDEFKM3Z6XMX4SS7IAQIMMLIPCPPBMMZ2TH4UELXIWQQAFMYQISY53HC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0963a67b9954fb2106bcb3a27cf2935085f5aa2ac4ad95d1adb88af9d64222aa
request
aaa375427592969306617acc500551330f0ecb0720614f04c0feee6370408cdd
transaction
f8b9c513947561806037c01609f9270d440983cae96ab7a4d5cc470f2fd50046
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35728
recomputing…
the chainentry 35728
sealed to the entry before
98e1d8a8b096fc5073d9788c70113ad1b72476106ed0d8b5ed6821d1691bd156
this leaf
bf1d455e607f406ab516b723cc674a64536b1fff7faa6b1ef454515e4e188283
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
V/tWJKBkm0DRQKSj24MXfCcVUOW+OLlJzcYXDWTBaXKli7USBufjBKG8F/uqhfcbdqQS1dwbynTD1ArlfbFQBw==