livelog 39,135 entries · root 99c8057a9836 · read 20:33:58
the record/entry 38994
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GD7XPDJVCW2C3C6N3WRI6RZRDYZX4BOIC3YZPXTA2PIBLHDUEUIEZNNY to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.843ms2026-09-07 18:03:54
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GD7XPDJVCW2C3C6N3WRI6RZRDYZX4BOIC3YZPXTA2PIBLHDUEUIEZNNY to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9f982345c9a2355d09a116d9a70306a88f2168d0f01904d882beea18399b2862
request
5966d98a9a5a9a063662f0e6126e67c66775bfc5393ba7793a1822299f2b1be1
transaction
ae1ba2f76c5e672a7ed55f6492f0407e0c001ea6cad1a1da350b6cc2ffd7711c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 38994
recomputing…
the chainentry 38994
sealed to the entry before
56f807dff2febecdab08ce3d19cb605e2a2afc46dc90497362a1a3d22a76db74
this leaf
c02a3323ed3f49879d6f9af5771a51fbf3a3f98e0309b6a053efa67f4f9b7f1c
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
TLqHW7/bXz16urKgA4rUVoH+bHysaXZnJQU9AW/fSI6K0UWi4/oFs2Wp+2h3OgbxauBnzoUYhNdbDCF12rVHDA==