why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBDAPEP65BXIJGNAMEA476I6XTGK7JUGERHMUZ3A5N2CUSI2D6DTOYJN, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBDAPEP65BXIJGNAMEA476I6XTGK7JUGERHMUZ3A5N2CUSI2D6DTOYJN is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f2d9c10a50a7ef4d6ffca8dfb4fda29d9ecac10a5e4f2484d4f512cc0aea35c7
- request
- 43d236e59004bbdc66610d64f2e371e613218757bc7d54b4f2d197ab94bc01c4
- transaction
- 022769b1651a190aa4f9bd48a2bfcffa7cd9b2b3ddc2069a1ae7d71abefd49b2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 2491
the chainentry 2491
- sealed to the entry before
- cf7d012f1f0d39c50c0974e52ebb0545e21d90a0594dd926e178e62bd0bb6ab6
- this leaf
- c12d48d9dbc7bb29ce7c938f00bc4457f7f5858686f1856542d6e1f4e0f11cd9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- gmHo6jmep1HpuAvyJIzVk0UQvpciaOkPR2TGtGAray7TQcvp7ojPlN3cmii34gKUOzH0UBXg0uyvLh3X1vl/Bg==