why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCFGTWI4FEQWNSWGLBL2SIFVLWRPOSNLATBCQNUVJDNQVI5QHOCUEGUY, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCFGTWI4FEQWNSWGLBL2SIFVLWRPOSNLATBCQNUVJDNQVI5QHOCUEGUY is on the screening list: force-escalated by the watchdog: the pattern "address-poisoning" was refused 5 times in this session, first at 2026-09-16T08:27:33.696Z
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 2360993fc6d50a6c95e4f566958df59425a5d3ac68fc3ef85776552772329976
- request
- b8f5fc4daf0669fd4bd908c08cb99147462147afb132d508ec3337a9cf9062ea
- transaction
- b3a33a97a2c635f7e2a5e3b05a7cf0c66fe9a807db870d3ee725e814c589367acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50708
the chainentry 50708
- sealed to the entry before
- 856b813de422719078a85ae973bfbf8f9aeaa03da808bafde01c5841a5af8234
- this leaf
- c1450a0d11af899e461efe66c393b0eb7a780057c2f6b31673214d4305a15617
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- P3CjC+BwJco8HLCK2amFJwvRb7WJDjotoEsXgANclVt3ccv8v2KZ2qKSapvJVRo+ky1fxAlWhlBSqqHEZyZUAg==