why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GB4L6JACUOYPTCXGHSKHEU6ARAXR5A4NOQE5US3NKMJQIZ4LJ2UJ2CRJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b9c3aa3ffd016fc25f3cc1d26be8831d72088a1881238d27def6669adc11d567
- request
- 9695b11869ed416c7e55db3b2cf6205bb104fededd30ec2f3a33ec407f1a325b
- transaction
- 1909339f81a2f6b40cc3aa22a9e00db6ed65b35ce8425e5d5a258681127c5e2fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7450
the chainentry 7450
- sealed to the entry before
- 0684a81815092915697f0c2f1ec85088dbf7395ff4099b2494b8a82c9daec804
- this leaf
- c2aa673685d61201669d92c732c8233a543ce293d7b68b5a962f5407ce0ee351
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- T/wJLkva+i0bhm+Jce7UtB85ZLrxnolm3gVSd1QtxvDfSv8ARePYlkDCa5CslNTHi84cgIyb6YDpx0/dktF3CA==