why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCRIFRSME6P5AFFHWMU2SJ5T7FQJRBQWPZVVSWPCZJIDMSAZCCVTIW7T, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8a10f53ee5cd9625e575a714984b249bddd2d5dd1e0b6df82924383f172a9423
- request
- 77a41211966dbba2e22fb8ab06df1c18dec5ff725d1245cde901da052e644dad
- transaction
- 46854dad95fb90e908eb82223b7acf13877b862dd0d6b106b7a9680cb7f7d6d1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50385
the chainentry 50385
- sealed to the entry before
- 0e975e55f0b81e4fbed138e893d6eb176de5aaa831d43045ed929c54d8f03be0
- this leaf
- c2dd4afe418e7b4054eb4a8de3cfa517531e7061313776f75960f875a6d393b9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- njwPcAB1ycQZ+I4Y2gB7UR6MwRJ55AQsmRklXHuKmyjgIZPUFF3BZ/Rxt2pcNaOUh2drFOeK5ZocGoN65CHkAw==