why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCJZUTFSY5HUN3VR6EGGW3BHTVAR2LBROCILXL7CKRF5HIE2NVYWZXFJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 093847a7ae47bad0c44615821e4adbc7001ae1a779c06a8c0096061d07ea17a4
- request
- 619ccacbd55444f9f21d7f3225f2552ffca30ce693acf0fd311bf5ad7eaabf3d
- transaction
- 18f2747bb39f568cbb76d9d638815c087ae56f41d791c74ed4db50c64f9adf06computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 53371
the chainentry 53371
- sealed to the entry before
- 78e77c8b4a4f0256b7a9d44eda38ed650b7e5525be3511df20afb8373fd44e3e
- this leaf
- c44999d4d8b5496d427cc624c38fa4cd94cfede3b9a31daeea972a7f77e4ed39
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- yALxZivcB8LR+8ygyOeXwSqMQl7d/IOqLkkwzECSFGZjZK5WtJqg5XvBmhcta14QwmtaroV6x6mjdrPHJWiZCA==