why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GANWJOWVJRF7VN6H47L6HJTRIPOXAAWPZGK55SWTH5DB52WVGXEUG2IR, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 700.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 847e128014dd914b65e2d1ca5c5cbc22cc1cfa4ed1cf417fc737ab93ba6913c8
- request
- 73d1de526228702016667f6f740b9392219b2b693d4b67fbc350247afa29a637
- transaction
- 0f06298f538baa411e74d09b6f4a571d353b99c5661593265283376c93ae2746computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57507
the chainentry 57507
- sealed to the entry before
- 9ea26f642ede16966dc84350dad8bb84aeeaa7208eac590121c8ea4613cba11f
- this leaf
- c4683c0f57e997b52c1670df5c9156902d53928a125e3c1f80da6c3ca7c0f520
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ehJOfuPUb810XqMCXHssEH+W+8hzYTlp8KK9AYM/kZVLmEBO1crsw6He23mzwLUYWFj1YcNSQFpdeM4eF+qTCg==