why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCQBJN54NZUPRODLFJ5LRBIOJEISGIAAQD37PT6XL766JIZ3B5HYRII4 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c1e488d18121b134e34235b6a2b6ae94156c6b36f473d85fa0da61ce84a4540e
- request
- 8da3c11c50b1ef89e7bee1731e88552589e7d31c70a71b8bc7c7b392c10a8d5e
- transaction
- ccb3d260f7a91d7dd4fb1d8b8aa485ae6b2da0ca1b5e28dc092488e5dd104ed8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 31252
the chainentry 31252
- sealed to the entry before
- bf59f1854ff58afef131efd2e01cf51ef216c9ceacddc77af4441d639827f4a1
- this leaf
- c4766760777ea3c86caa3691a7c26598db0d22a4e07719e437b1893129c711ea
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Tsq1F+qJnJOPs3WcGSIV9sEMrtjp7TQd6RYZbv1uCjDMaIPoPrOOLUVK7iUauRWMIWTD+nWmh79QSqTbbX75Cg==