why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GB5RLZ5L3S2RRBMZS25J3L3EFEO3P4WU3YB44A7XQOXKA2WVDK7TKH53 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 03f2faa17647316798ac3b085bbd8fd9229a3330d9d8df2d2d95a52d96edca2b
- request
- f8a2016b8aa7ba8dada36f1e005647252769d54be2df6d5b6a351fc5e9178768
- transaction
- fdc89dcfea920c985b952fcd2e7e9d8469875e1ee0bca0a15a174d839253e96acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 8158
the chainentry 8158
- sealed to the entry before
- 7880f0ae992778ea66e9bd59a16958b9bb70ebebf7fe5ce122c60f4620abb9dc
- this leaf
- c65211c0ebddc071026d55fa6a0d494aadcf675ca12b88719fb2d6a27fd4bcfb
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- n6YKU3iWqnK4EbB/QCWPPlybSX+kSundc8+7/Mt1mLjUDpmsUGnorN5K7OxAaWtzcQd8d8wgPENIjsYi+cKlBQ==