why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBQIHGKOFXG3YXMYFU35LHQENN6H3BM6NH7YYOAE36AY2AC2PMNLTRVO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a116de4ff91ebc3432a1ea4bb40211c8c5468cfc5b0fb82e55f28adbaa41f38e
- request
- 7d921ae205505266f503eda8356d8fb5649f334dcbd6ff932e7720a5ca42a539
- transaction
- 03e77f550ae2a0c0ecc7196f27382ea8018da849d15cbb3bad35c11cd6eadfbecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 53055
the chainentry 53055
- sealed to the entry before
- 49b2f881d54621638d60fbd59acc4bb8726895f7cbf7cf46b7f1d7a27082837b
- this leaf
- c71994f6c140144ddd7b3cdbb0038e2061ab1b82c1e991e00d15d9c724cbc766
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 3sZMDDfKZaa/lqwHVlN6rGbgkZ5mafbmyZih/aU8092P+TaW6z0FSOsGU2T2wmQ3U08PM2NOWQo+6z04O2p1Bg==