why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDHPBCETDSJWFJVUJCL2DWIY3LZUFG37NGO33DU5RQM5LLR6OPZ2N3TO, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f9a19a69d4bb8b1fa12578360adef4b6ece516ab2c4bfd02709b5b6193ad94c6
- request
- 2f875e5e8ca0849b53de98d3cd0dce94e105e775d678844c4257da4d922a336d
- transaction
- 6f07e0c69dd7c38e35cf3b8bceed3d431ba22b378c3bac55ea11b0b9464e93a1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1119
the chainentry 1119
- sealed to the entry before
- 824480243110bf965f39412131debec7eaaa1d1c6e4fe1cd3187d39078cbb8b5
- this leaf
- c7acd86a59ffa1aff4041f993cf903cfb161bce7279cac7316c01ef74c093a8a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- U3Dcm+gwLJ6tel6oxJo6VsmmzO8l5Y7itfEd46Fdcj8dzq5qzka6JAxwEJ2g9js4NaI43n7T2CMKeN1wKRvvAA==