why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAHAFCEAXPULPTBJBCS3E33ARL6B5JE5N6S7DSEZAN4EI5H3GBLHODUQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 60c8c807f986f7ea596dd10427b060f2340a4b4c84031854a89bb08ba60a500f
- request
- e907c7a47b2d102666a754eddf99a1ccd0bf8b41e134dd94eb6a3d27400da224
- transaction
- de430f5d8ae3d13d3e2e0290893d4545520fe2acca70a2a2b330c036475fcf48computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 47635
the chainentry 47635
- sealed to the entry before
- ad8e349a58aa410de07caf6bd81b6f57437e8b9390d5ef23610b8e3965cfeebf
- this leaf
- c870212514f7846e113e017c13ffc313a28810cee1ed5603c268b1ad8b7b9c03
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- X3AOBBmdw5YakB5JjGnWlM93mIsRYhUefE8pFTx78Z+tZor/RrTww3EJuNUnYRpPLoLRnTCUZ+auAF0K4d3dDQ==