why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCPKGM5V4QXNSRALVRS7JL75O5G3H5NHD6RQMZ4E4BYLNFOQ5WBT2BMZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b81d1f7ed090e1d2b2eaf4aabd6b7162b99c2f9d1ca9da250c1ba0f52454db77
- request
- 09938b1135af4847072a1f52d7cb2487f39afaa538d7d2968a4feb8f1fd9dd62
- transaction
- 6031480b5f6300eef33b484979ffbcf87e9ed34739b1a2d0064d3f09edc05ea2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15539
the chainentry 15539
- sealed to the entry before
- 0e7b1cde8375f87c44709cabc5dad1c2807e4ea8c03edea1f5783fa90092f649
- this leaf
- cacfbab11d52aa6f17a5750822d8dc3c5bce2a8271da1deeff526160b9d6fca9
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- SCHTXh8jUhgjznp+SYBml+3naqwRhzjazTtuSyXcD8Wr2XMZqBAlBtJ/2T9n1SX/6cUFdsloiFWUH/vGZ4A+Dw==