livelog 11,859 entries · root b2c5cc21de76 · read 17:13:01
the record/entry 6099
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBGDUAZN5KWGCRR44WZ5MQTQ2JFZ525TQ5WGZQSVGKS5VWRMLHAG6IZH to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.889ms2026-08-13 05:07:27
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBGDUAZN5KWGCRR44WZ5MQTQ2JFZ525TQ5WGZQSVGKS5VWRMLHAG6IZH to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
ca8b3c97d0c9376ff1ffc9f9d0628178bd7c3f35b2675edc1d78e3fa2c2ad58d
request
1e0ea8d5855f1c910ca1f11f7f9bd6250c1a96a09afedf5751e99d867b647cbb
transaction
fc6686457d1a068345e37592a406cee088b80551968e104aa73534f8af715042
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6099
recomputing…
the chainentry 6099
sealed to the entry before
dc230ca1344070056cb3be1f581c097a31a10fada631b3a08bf80b2be5e78afd
this leaf
cb175796244a7f8a3a919cc0a5bbd5bc370e7f3662c3a30bdb1bc6b903f3e9f6
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
PO4TD6RHU8hiGUze3GKfsDwvuuNBaeI2hrKv4pdJJSjx3wrlWe43+8yrFQLAReBeN5/MHeDwXLIkU4B+xlY0Cg==