livelog 34,729 entries · root 3e334b424003 · read 09:32:48
the record/entry 34599
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GB4WFNA7ON5L4ANNOL2T6GHKWSN4RI6YNMNDOT5RUTUD3KKZJR4XFCRY to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 7.696ms2026-09-04 07:07:48
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GB4WFNA7ON5L4ANNOL2T6GHKWSN4RI6YNMNDOT5RUTUD3KKZJR4XFCRY to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0f5b40ea093c8054af6d40833ef753afe76af1cd687900a8ef8d72e7e8d3f6ae
request
4be84223e0b5c6fe2543b7e88d29fc5e84d3a2a667dbed965855a34fa0558c86
transaction
f8a3b7e839a27534213e489356d49b439918c913351a20cfe003ac17b65f9bdf
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 34599
recomputing…
the chainentry 34599
sealed to the entry before
d45063579f08a670507b7d84dbe328e9ea29bd6910dcac7544725abdb64317d9
this leaf
cc46ea68126f8dedc9b560abe9adcee98de94fbdf7276ccd0ce7f8c3f6f29a53
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
jYQwPd+dhIhe8bS8rTatrOOtPZSFp35GvyE7GmxnaSZDf91u2mBFrSuSsbNhF9yl3sY5Lm9bX3VJosu+QI/bBw==