why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBJKCVSZSQWVLKEEJ7KSEY4LW772IQL4CGUW4NMP4HDSWRSF6274QF5N, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBJKCVSZSQWVLKEEJ7KSEY4LW772IQL4CGUW4NMP4HDSWRSF6274QF5N is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 0bfd715ffe106979e17d7f4a88e9b4030a30caa960f14f65d224c3bf19225c8b
- request
- 54d5b54c86c01e2e53ff0cde1ce85e2e2a371c21e8c40454c8dd0be4bc28fd76
- transaction
- 2c06b6abeb6446b0b7812907af85baedc58c9ca04436ad2c7e64b230c4755f9acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76734
the chainentry 76734
- sealed to the entry before
- 8441463ac2dc16ee8a36d1c529b35396ee934f62f21bf92bf4718f56882419b7
- this leaf
- cc72c54623b07b2aa81fd73e39792f936ddd06512ae7257e289edd25b7d31a75
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- GFhhax3aMRmHHc5LiKZWln09tPJcnZr402XNgJexjUSjVvcfCckV3Nbw7xM0rPOdbP3clPYqYWAgczk4c85tDw==