why1 reason
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 900.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f8b92a13be2e5ed4ec7f2bfe8cf501f292e6c737523719d1a0d215a43d911277
- request
- 46420de474bd324b6c1d1017c467b6a9e587520d05b863d9d0381cc2e408c48b
- transaction
- e4109c63cd5e270d44ca539bdb29c187c49e9bc9ad82aff3d3c966b976ec31f1computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50369
the chainentry 50369
- sealed to the entry before
- a0486bb2f85fd16905a9f3a429c34bf68fed810ca56622b560971e083f6f3949
- this leaf
- ccd87a4253d6e99af306858494c73e63c4a6ea93187d635a96ed85f93bb6bab5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 3M09JstwSpspXOu3vbWdR4eD/abGafC3T0fGRu2gDGTveOfxs44dqWxdcog836uYLUwq0nAn7pXu8Rno2V9xCg==