why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC7RUFFYXJHNCLDUIPCETFJW5RCZFWHRZKCZL3QG5VB4L2J53DRLCWYA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 537bb3152ac0d350c09b772149b7228c83d91d661d15c9cfe808a1a31f59a2d0
- request
- 48611a9bc7da4372f0ec95f9027e95ec4fdd600d177579eef94545411dfea8a7
- transaction
- 0f99a37ccb30895761a9fc510fcd509a78e58457d72850a65afb745b438273c3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76430
the chainentry 76430
- sealed to the entry before
- ac26a342795b042d6c4e2f319d109b026de9a58684a34b1923fae7ca0604fd14
- this leaf
- ccec4df1bdbf0ca76e319921ae248a437d77e0dbb832fd73b46cacd902ac743f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 54jBtLvRssW/VF9OsNPvQfn1wCI3oEZ1Cjw+/RaqUvmwuSYG3Aeav1tz9EHVOsiFxeLvIK9b2ZXBK8IgJZ6BAQ==