why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCUVLF3PK4CWGMFBECFNMLRJL6GOCBJXJVC5WH35KIQ7JQCIATMZ6SBA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 4575e5a633021def0865aba8b2a910c61de4db4c3f8ec5c4e1ad6772c75e5242
- request
- aff094d1d44285530291a874ffb73d95bbb61d90aa75ea079a9c5e4fe28e6b22
- transaction
- 4d71d7e088756eac89646ab4fee6d888ace4ec763d67ef16d52d6723e8dc648acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 46456
the chainentry 46456
- sealed to the entry before
- b642ae4c8eed939bc33543ef3ebcfad80d4c4ca94a8431779288ca0969c3f763
- this leaf
- cd2bd0ff5f308c5f9a8501f76b6b5da17ecbe4778fd71d09ebe404d705d64b63
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- GL7C0fvJ2f5u+ooiGN91Z6UBBpgsr2k4Wl1uft8Wt3iori7XsMzmp3N2B1V5LehSiyDJAsj5/j5Zx6MPLaCIBA==