why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAM55MWHNQOEBUGW6I6EVX75J6PMGQ3MGYCSGD6B7TZK4M72OMVU6ELW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 0cbdc6826b3b2aee82559be6866f3bd06094bf20344a1f141c8c6d04ef9514af
- request
- 5696974366407943106774275f1c3a1a76e53d743937c1f309af9d1f18bb521b
- transaction
- ddca56ee8b7c7054d8eef7e32c31080cfcfddb424277c26815ed4e7c0c92544bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 47731
the chainentry 47731
- sealed to the entry before
- 735f6e75a59fa9da92836c35e13ad874549b739ce4d3b62de5abcea7c6d81adb
- this leaf
- cda72e862bd62f465c9d61119ee54904bffc2ef3e2a72e73f8a926a545cb56f8
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- njbyJcom5cRhlTXyk86fy1jo1cx78Ln9oOq5xOr6Ty+hSwWIRXJWM1dUmVmQqnf/lr0tgMg567uSGrzwkV7bDg==