why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBVEVX75RZPGYSKIRRDUCURCWSC2V4A5V3ZJVINKL7OGKI3LLNNH5ZJC, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e707d6964ce2fded9d5aed690f65d38f82eed94efb8bc3d383e2558de46f28f2
- request
- 0723000633bcf997c1afc74d76895c378e80b58fa540b32dcba2c42f696a1b5f
- transaction
- b6097dc3cac0d17e65c6296e7a80557fe257a9d7be54d2c1f1c2b7c7deda3d2ecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57497
the chainentry 57497
- sealed to the entry before
- d6989c6e1a78f362bb73f590ce90e4ec57d90ad1be7d29becb87751d3762e8bf
- this leaf
- cdb7c9d6a62f2e9e96af4c62b5cbdab7d5da3c994a57b23185bb0768bd3743e4
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- nOCELaoAdnZ14DPb7sls4ZCWxQL3zestEN7iJxWgbkrnqrRz9DSbS2LVgMedMPF8sUwpq4vrCo13bDF/vIj/Bw==