why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GARQRRW2R4H3U4WDKVR7O7D2H6HWG5HOSXYM4NAFJ6L2JDK32A65DTL5, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GARQRRW2R4H3U4WDKVR7O7D2H6HWG5HOSXYM4NAFJ6L2JDK32A65DTL5 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- eb7c22ff6dc37ffbdbca8ee1b034fa49fa189606215f476e62b423ce0b7c621d
- request
- df1fbaee56618b5c757d0d5f0a59c249083dcf2e99c51295bbddc111eeb4ca4a
- transaction
- bf8752b0f138899fe2153299227100926b129bec84cac5ac8e5475c1d3700410computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 45087
the chainentry 45087
- sealed to the entry before
- 3af2cd72e37ff211f6055bbedc87302ce0188507100ca492645ef10e494bd024
- this leaf
- ce6254dd5fc825b96a5f7a7ccba6da3f5b8cbd0e76805298f0076c623b0b951e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- iiyP0U6SqwX8nkhg/k4/NdPSHhK6qKGTLyP8ip56g9ImmH53KFLjZJ6DqUVv6FkxKUR68+ikk2ZpVrK7fl9JCw==