livelog 17,852 entries · root 8d9d1ac11c8b · read 09:08:14
the record/entry 17409
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GC66G76VVL4XTJIAS446JKG7KEQ74FULTKTIS446YXCZLA6JJTRSLEB6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.669ms2026-08-22 00:47:32
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GC66G76VVL4XTJIAS446JKG7KEQ74FULTKTIS446YXCZLA6JJTRSLEB6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
cdb160a107ff17134ba63d64e8873cd6561dd168aaa5293dc91cb9e28a2cd341
request
f3735d956cefa3b03b44938e06dfb7cb011a23998de88728ef70e69f652dec12
transaction
8a55f84372912f04c6e8ebd4cfc04e971b72d9087b7d3d3fda4334fbe431523f
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 17409
recomputing…
the chainentry 17409
sealed to the entry before
efc619291913c7a57a73a144060e0e601cfd2c5328e5ddc8c2ff886e42fa20a3
this leaf
ce78d410223b6117e1f5265ce14109368b91051039cc9935858dbb539acd8fc1
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
uNImcE/CHdmLgkZLHTSQZL0xFCgCPnl0TxEd0CXGcTJi4kieELHtk30zjCTBcCqhhkSUKoHU2wXYWnUKbaLdDw==