why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDIMIW4P4EN73XN2XIC7ZYKYSXAK4ETNMUO33RW7IM576AC532RHDUCB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 62434e2527b69727dcae4c38c8ecba01e1b56900838531adc3137760766fab72
- request
- 25045a785dab22f066bcba8ce84b3162012782d1f809e840b71b4c32f5cd2e5d
- transaction
- fafa0a9e38b152e0ecf3f41d6447457b993cf064d4d3e1a3fd13e2b7d0b6b083computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 55347
the chainentry 55347
- sealed to the entry before
- 4b83da98920711fef4d89a0089743c32adac5b55f71446e5d4fa718d04c5ceea
- this leaf
- cfa653cc953717f0b255ae39ab5fe094844263ddfc3e661abaf7a43c7b76284a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- wd6IK8+re1/5VSGhSEBZOpkRX/ch+HsDlT9IV0tDzXcB44XRNZWYGXB8J3nSyvX8mUTRmqBcjerPUtohIvFzBQ==