livelog 31,410 entries · root 417a668ea133 · read 20:42:44
the record/entry 30559
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBGFZLF6323WUKOPGNW72IGN3VKIQDUDWWMWVE4RRIOTJVLCHYM52Q35 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.768ms2026-09-01 05:02:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBGFZLF6323WUKOPGNW72IGN3VKIQDUDWWMWVE4RRIOTJVLCHYM52Q35 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
b7e0169898f2b3eb39dca12fe05a3f95fe6b764b27766392ad44ca6ed3bc8963
request
c247da8ab63ae0fa23bce21bcf733ba6ab05f908876095d8bd2b09e7bc4a4a38
transaction
da2a691ffa77f7aa7b76b72ea671fa8b9998b670c4c4d3221a51c64bc3deb947
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30559
recomputing…
the chainentry 30559
sealed to the entry before
159d502847ad8b4b617eb83089fd82ffd1d72b04165202d1992b3897dbfd85ab
this leaf
cfb17b868187ed37f369aa1f1f8b5575e5d3dd83aaf340e475fefb6e31b7005f
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
pHEnBjILTqGU7GDU/u/YmC2EbaA0FMffRc3vxmF9K7x4EipLb3MwCQxWVSMsvLMsJ9+z8+ISZxo+UCnjwswvCQ==