why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB7WTJKG2OSSMKORLQ2OBYBYD3PTG5ZQNH2PR45FY2TMPKONYH3JA7ZQ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB7WTJKG2OSSMKORLQ2OBYBYD3PTG5ZQNH2PR45FY2TMPKONYH3JA7ZQ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 72114c3c389fd16b323f616a7e5d7e9c0cd2fe20070f9b314fec1d02fb0373ba
- request
- b683ee8075bc731fd88180d3c16fcc4f53e0ee0bc9a527679baba3c1b879b076
- transaction
- 2eb17e88bb69fe6d32cf1b0fdc0228ac51b3ca53a3ce726f9e6ae1fc5f9d388fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 76169
the chainentry 76169
- sealed to the entry before
- a314d7943e86212d07254b912d1df75d89c5bd8524d603820ef7f0af2fb33db3
- this leaf
- cfe87f88087863310f26dc3c5beb63459b7d41f55072655ee75d82924689692f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- UAC76DxLfbfScaJWpOu/417P+liQPAv7g+iJV+OPnN6F1TK582YmlSCnRBSmHlTJL6K/g15DhCLkw4O9Cn6bDA==