why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GALUH6KNLADM3UJ6PSVISMNX3N6P4OEJDASREPR6WRQHBLRN4WJT2GNN to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e43fde822307bf472e4dc9875633e2f44bb233f3a6f7ae181768b479f9df01a6
- request
- aa1c1470e021bf94c9433aca2f4df6b3ebf15a9bbb05cea1e6a56912f09099cc
- transaction
- a6e980e83e55f2faa1aa7595d8153992caaa3b16978f3d944ef5ed479f9444fdcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 69090
the chainentry 69090
- sealed to the entry before
- ac995dfe7f7b7ba4b3f4e2ff912b8676bfaf52ce2e2cd8b88c744f022b086455
- this leaf
- d04b99cf3faecf332e4d1c3c51cea45f2eeb803f5ca7be048ef468971ad2de3e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- qOHQmT3wua6UZ/GnSUix7ChdUMwfaXe1dE9ZnLH0DlmjgCbWOT0jAhjXHkQdMPSZCUXWugJ5SvJ1WeoRvZ5zBg==