why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAFH7NHY4NIH36WH6S5KTNZBNG2KLPFSGF5OQ5FKZX33H4P3ZTCLLOL7, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAFH7NHY4NIH36WH6S5KTNZBNG2KLPFSGF5OQ5FKZX33H4P3ZTCLLOL7 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a909a199de308288f88b304f048f79107d4931560187a9191a0fe853d5f2a019
- request
- 3dd7d73751e654dbf400943e3869917b77ff72a22cd6249a3c68155f600b377f
- transaction
- 66d7a5befaff4fa2c86b9e21b22f7c0ee6468c8d4549b6d3e68b8688307f7c88computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 13285
the chainentry 13285
- sealed to the entry before
- 3c8772e5d90770ea7af73e9f52c3d237930d034dd1d1ead21d850375af263be2
- this leaf
- d2230d49d4554ea4f71f1cfc5f54976916055c13bf3ff4977418218669bfa1a4
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- FlovnHeSpjsusndxvRw4vvlEgd/BJ92VZtadTXM7ffolQ3ei6rK/A7FCnZ5qz8O7IHFWt4uPH8oUQckJetb/Ag==