why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GCVS6LEKEG2QMPZOZ3QSHUVANFVZFQ2OS33S6GLZNO4RXBNFREVZWKA6, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GD5FPURZGDTUYNQU73EGRH4C3KKF2CHZBQIUNVAO5GN2JDYFQDUVXXFT, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GD5FPURZGDTUYNQU73EGRH4C3KKF2CHZBQIUNVAO5GN2JDYFQDUVXXFT is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dafb2609ff3688902f780d4573d6280c44708ec4c1d03a3722322bc9f3c53d94
- request
- 66f959645a9557c90c0a8cd22674eb02d9edeb4478d50b4e7339c650b6eca30b
- transaction
- 10a8bf913309fb43ca8a9a10025feed8dcb9ac7cddd3bbe805936f71ef931f57computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56916
the chainentry 56916
- sealed to the entry before
- 949c2c08807026b771cae7841d48cc5ca835ec3f56d39b4b07c307b51645518d
- this leaf
- d3774a9d1e1ee4dc111d3fe08835d47a7a00bad6c11f81b04bf6c877c6e6d9e8
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- uVGWFGMfp45ITu1OxuNQIEvot4mlEMjf9/3m8vmPG8mqtlgh7gSE/7TgSwubKHLMhXrnpBlByH3J7d2qb2uABQ==