why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDSHH4AU4IW5JELZAJGB36LGYA66BYO27QSRGC4AXNRL3UB7SVZCDMPT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b3b4fcab3c63ae5522f7eaf8698683b33940aa7a6ecae4cdcde5982e99f01be8
- request
- e06914c3756887535fb98a2332c391d43a16c51b54b603a2ab3bd6c363ecd012
- transaction
- 34a1743f1a4f8745b3a578e6baef4dee6b8229d2505f68cd568e27c72b5d20a4computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 62900
the chainentry 62900
- sealed to the entry before
- 5391444c5b779ae111588402d6027eb2b3dc1fe9669cd1a028b3d1eb5990943d
- this leaf
- d3c39c6152269faefdabc2b540387f41f2d82e48fad9b34ac94a2929381f4754
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- u0JhtX5ZCc4wLiMgSib9Z+tkLRnBziNhTd1Eh0wEzscjwdmQnfjkUFoKodV8N06Qi73HAD5KdoRTk9BOzwcDCQ==