why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC56QYK2RIUH3FNAT33PXXB3AZUQZOE2UGES33AQMWM47ZU7TRKTMLT2 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1dc60ae362ccbb01e706532174d0adc3db54ee4d8b3a22d36fe57a20acc481c3
- request
- 868ceb9e48ceb391acb1adff51e3cdae30dddd6664512c6ba825fb884efe7f39
- transaction
- d4d23324f317f3455c9af5a3b45c1c3689178843e8d2981f75ac7ea03c4e50b5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 73905
the chainentry 73905
- sealed to the entry before
- 657b83e837d27dd4be510095df9ecd801e63a03f4865bb03546888b63a32dcfc
- this leaf
- d41436ea27d614a7ef46128bf72d2e74f0af8e1137124f8dd083e1d047b92427
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YuJuKc5HI+r4e2x+OAA7CUxCTgZRI6jowSY5LSjvxBi8ALrKv/ymF4WV7AqU0T7N/QcZaAx96YDw08h3Z9EeDg==