why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCX4RF3TZSC4XJKX3BNZG27BWQSTPD2L3OIVV4RBH75Q3F3IGDJWGRHQ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCX4RF3TZSC4XJKX3BNZG27BWQSTPD2L3OIVV4RBH75Q3F3IGDJWGRHQ is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d8181eaced0181c2c531798cb54c9ed29a2b39a6c321daf86666c33e25a6b4bb
- request
- 1a99c04cc806e15c556035f0360f8ad7c7e39651bd4a4c0d2914415d830f357e
- transaction
- bb4a0417d7ccf80042da9cf7b06707a75c197cb4af231e205a8032c01d22ffcecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 12540
the chainentry 12540
- sealed to the entry before
- 6a74bb05f10cc73cb7960c47e863b7632a44b502d3ca1871bd6e150901139899
- this leaf
- d467caf6f7269950aa618dbad0774669352fcd513d9be4d66f344cc8fab46e7b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- QZ5FYHnFpRkZ/bO+jsE6IJsyAb+WzoqFlzDRfFjeAgvMYpd4sIUaIweb40pHenYg2cwtscCpDJWNGQYmg+jUAg==