why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDBUOWQ3C7BESC5AJ37NNBOMPEJL5YEEOXSXXMQ4UTVRRWWALHO2PTIW, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 700.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c44ba1bd327d03cecd82d8b01951923f82f6ce3fabbe428efadcf5da2e6174e8
- request
- 86817be4f636afb7badcfaaa04e2d4e76e59feb49a07389bd25368ce41902a5d
- transaction
- 10a68adb3ee4fd96f41d6644858cb4b0efecc6e051cd2c0a25ac4c7c9b692d2fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 58979
the chainentry 58979
- sealed to the entry before
- 3233e37f1422e027d406333de566292e63121b0aca5cb4b7dd40adbaf68efd9a
- this leaf
- d528f98c1223144a39bcc582007946e494b6a37623b9a983a68af8854c42b57d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 6+KzZ/ZnZMb1Ato9uYLQfmn2WvYtXejMXnpZg9ec7MOP0DbWPzvLAABlhHkWpISCmuKZLVl5L1DziRshZU82Dg==